Actually, paying $8 or whatever to sit in BFE and watch the Rays on a weeknight isn’t the worst thing in the world. The $17 watered-down beers, however, are. The Times has a short piece this morning on slogans over the years with some reasonably good analysis, kind of a fun read. I’m too lazy to come up with a high-larious related image for this post, so you’ll have to settle for Papa Bush.
Speaking of the Rays, I’m made increasingly nervous by all the activity surrounding the idea of a new stadium. I’m beginning to fear that it is a done deal and they just aren’t telling us yet. Although, what am I saying? The city guberment wouldn’t just make bad decisions on our behalf without us having some say, right? No, that just couldn’t be, they’ve never done that in the past.
got a tip?
love
buy shit
subscribe
recent comments
- Amy: ARTPool and BlueLucy present the third annual I Love St. Pete Show, January 10th,...
- Rob: have gun, will travel is playing the uptown bar. rebekah pulley is at the globe....
- Christy: The 2nd Annual “A Reason to Rock” Parkinson’s benefit...
- Autopsy IV: Tomorrow night Drag The River is playing the Tattoo Convention....
- Hellie: It is a damn fine looking restroom from the exterior. The interior is as scuzzy...
21 Responses
There will be a referendum in Nov. If it doesn’t pass than it’s a done deal. No new ball park. In addition to all the other environmental permits and stuff they would need that could all be deal breakers.
The new stadium will be a reality – Regardless of refs or permits. This has been in motion for a really long time. When the people with money and power want something, they usually get it. Aside from their shady dealings… why is everyone so opposed to a new waterfront stadium? It would completely transform that area and bring new life to the current snore-fest. Plus, the existing stadium totally sucks. Baseball was never intended to be played inside. I see more good things in a new stadium.. rather than bad. I’m not a huge ball fan either… but It makes makes sense for the downtown economy. Hey, and if you want places like Push and other new spots to survive… the city will need better economic anchors. It’s all interconnected. Not moving forward, is always a setback.
The #1 reason I think it is a shit idea is that moving a failing baseball team that has no local support 7 blocks will not suddenly make it an economic anchor. Do you blame the current location and facilities for the place being largely empty most of the time?
I love how the Devil Rays–sorry, the RAYS :-)–are telling us St. Petersburgiouse that the Trop is no longer economically viable but promise once the dome is leveled Crate & Barrell will spring forth from the ground like a bubbling ooze. Its akin to me bitching how bad my car is and then asking you to buy it . . . for $150 million.
Rabi, what year is it? Sounds like a good deal to me.
First.. yes I do place a lot of blame on the architecture of the stadium. I’ve been to some of the greatest stadiums in America. There is a reason they’re great. It’s a fun, enjoyable experience. The trop has bad energy.. it’s dank and devoid of natural light. It’s 100% psychological. It even effects the players. I would suck too, if that was where I had to play all the time.
Second.. you are incorrect on the impact it would have. May I ask? Have you ever lived anywhere other than St. Pete?
Last, If you want you’re clubs, nightlife and other things to thrive, you’re gonna get a side of bubbling ooze with it .. because after all, the appropriate question isn’t what year… but what country.
I know its been there for 18 years now but still, is replacing it already really justified? Seems like a shit deal to me.
Casey, its a 1978, Royal Deluxe II:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHetg_A8_g0
Ah, I love cheering on a shitty baseball team that wants to take my money.
Ah, nothing like using sarcasm as a rebuttal. I’d say it was borderline genius.
Art Official. I did not know I was rebutting you. I didn’t even read your posts. But, saying baseball should not be played indoors is ridiculous. Ask the Marlins how many people show up to games in August with 97 degree heat and a 60% chance of rain. And they won two World Series titles. Its just the same concept of playing football indoors in the winter in Minneapolis or Detroit or Indianapolis.
As for declaring the new stadium and economic boom for downtown, it seems downtown is doing pretty good now with 3 new condo towers w/ retail, BayWalk, a new Publix, and an even hand to independent businesses. And the same argument was made 10 years ago when the Rays arrived to Central and 16th. What big business has the D-Rays brought to that area? Besides the Kizmet Cafe, of course.
Debating the merits of publicly-funded stadiums to house private enterprises is always fun to do! Many advocates often point to the promise of a vitalized local economy surrounding a new stadium. This seems obvious. However, the argument (pure ideology) can be undermined easily if you consider the extent to which capital inevtiably *leaves* the local area. Payroll is the biggest possible source for economic infusion (even if the Rays payroll is a paltry $86 million). And yet, most of the players do not live here. So where is that money being spent/invested? It is being spent elsewhere, in Spring, TX, La Jolla, CA, Norwalk, IA, or where ever those guys call home. Most of those millions are not reinvested in the burg. Just one way to look at it.
Speaking of the stadium, and nifty slogans: “This year we’re blue.”
didn’t Fergs start because of the Ray’s?
I could be totally wrong on that.
However, how would a 7 block move translate to more money for downtown? A new stadium will only attract more people for a small period of time. 1/2 through it’s first season it would be back to 4000 people unless the Yankees or Red Sox are in town.
The new stadium plans are beautiful though.
The current stadium was a huge blunder. The city made a mistake putting it where it is. They made false forecasts of the city’s future and growth. Now they’re are trying to correct all those mistakes made years ago. Their plan to extend the city beyond MLK backfired. So, ok, downtown is doing well. But not great. Rabi, you seem happy with what Baywalk and publix did for downtown… yet opposed to a “crate & barrel” that would ooze up from the stadiums wake. Dude! they’re the same thing. How can you praise one and blast the other??
On the last few posts… The best thing about a waterfront stadium would be increased foot traffic. We need more people walking downtown. The place is dead! People on the streets is good for business. Ask any downtown biz. It’s all about foot traffic.
Oh no, I don’t oppose Crate & Barrel. Maybe “a bubbling ooze” was poor choice of words. I want guaruntees that retail, or commercial business will show up once the Trop is demo’ed. Just because the Rays say it will happen, doesn’t mean it will.
The last thing I want it an empty lot where the Trop was and a compete parking clusterfuck downtown. I would wholly welcome an upscale retail center and support the new stadium if the developers where lined up. But, in this real estate market, I have serious doubts.
I agree, an empty lot would be a disaster. And you’re right, just cause they say it… doesn’t mean they’ll do it. I have doubts as well, but, I also have some optimism for what it could mean… if done properly.
Autopsy makes a good point, check out the stats over the years - totally kickass when the stadium was new, then they sink like a rock with a slight upswing in the last few years. Also, remember that at 6 pm this Thursday is the Rays Project Public Hearing, should be quite interesting. Theoretically you can watch it here.
The fix is in.
The council is paid off.
The Mayor has something deposited somewhere to his benefit
The Rays will get what they want at the expense of the schmoes who live there.
Is this a great country or what?
Everyone gets what they want - at someone else’s expense. That’s America.
About the attendance and how it would impact an area only 7 blocks away… Here’s how it works. Currently - You drive to the trop. You park. You go in. See the game. Games over. You go out and get in your car.. and then you drive to your next destination. As Autopsy pointed out.. really the only thing to do is walk over to Ferg’s. Ferg’s? Hang on, I just threw up a little in my mouth. and.. then had a vision of the T-Shirt… “Save Ferg’s – Vote NO on 3″
Now…. think about a stadium on the water. What will all those people do before and after games? They’ll be walking around.. spending more time in the city… spending more money downtown. Now…Imagine you own a shop, cafe, club etc… Would you want to be 7 blocks away from 10,000 plus potential customers? or would you rather have them walking right by your front door? Think about that – and then think about how there are over 80 home games each season.
So if you think 7 blocks doesn’t make a difference… don’t ever open a business. Cause it’s all about location.
Oh, and the Rays said we can have family picnics on the grass when they’re not all using it and stuff.
That ROCKS! Think about it! You can grab a bucket of chicken and some 40s, head over there with a blanket and get it on with the lady while your kids are running around all the seats looking for change.
And it’ll only cost us $450,000,000. Plus parking garages. And rapid transit right of way and buses, a ferry terminal for the Tampons that want to come over, and a new sewage plant out on Albert Whitted… Suddenly we’re much closer to a $Billion.
Fried Chicken! Yummy!
Great points Art. I’m actually rather shocked to see that there wouldn’t be more support for the budding economy and positive changes that have been happening in the area. Granted, we cling to our roots and protect our historical establishments as best we can when we are discussing new commercial opportunities and economic growth. I’d never want to see my beloved Independent dive. But the benefits of having a real baseball stadium in a thriving area like downtown St. Pete (closer then where it is now) can only be realized when you think of how much closer it would be to the most popular aspects of our night life. In fact, if a place such as this were to be built, I think it would offer an outstanding amount of business near the water.
I might be biased right now. I live a block and a half away from Al Lang and only like The Rays. If you look at the plans for the mixed use development in the area that the dome is in, it might sound more attractive. With the cost of the stadium being split state-wide (and some if it federally actually) I’m having a difficult time looking for a reason to not be in favor of moving the team to the water.
My only issue was that the initial talks explained that the St. Pete Grand Prix, a great source of event revenue, would no longer be able to take place because of the road changes. Now I’m told by friends that they read somewhere that the Grand Prix will still be able to be held? Don’t quote me, but that would be a definite plus.
And if your issues revolve around how poor The Rays have been playing, you might want to take a look at our new lineup and read the guarantee that Maddon has given us regarding a .500 average this year. Everyone wants a team that wins, and I understand how much easier it is to just not like the team because they haven’t done anything special yet. But that doesn’t mean that they won’t turn a profit each season. It can be depressing to see an empty stadium but again, going back to the new stadium, there are plans to build it to a proper estimated game attendance isntead of just filling a dome with seats.
Dan (I’m too tired to proof read all of this and check for spelling and grammar… sorry)
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply