Sometime last night it looks like the city expanded their existing panhandling law. According to this Bay News 9 story, it sounds like we’re going to start locking up everyone and their brother, which isn’t necessarily true. Since the 70s we’ve had panhandling laws in place, the new bits primarily expand the reach of the law to places like the Pier, Vinoy and Williams parks. It is true, though, that panhandlers can indeed be jailed simply for asking for change.
What the fuck is wrong with us? Instead of exploring social programming that may help prevent the causes of homelessness we’d rather give ourselves reasons for persecuting the homeless and in some cases even jailing them? We live in a city that has had more public discourse on a fucking baseball stadium move than on the issue of the homeless. We live in a city that has largely already removed the poor from the downtown area to build empty condos for rich assholes, while simultaneously removing the junk shops and mom and pops to put in upscale douchebag stores and restaurants for said rich assholes.
It is so fitting that the guy they quote in the Bay News 9 story is the dickshift that owns the cigar bar on Central. You know what I’d rather have downtown than a bunch of assgobblers hanging out at cigar shops? That’s right, panhandlers. I just hope dickshift #2 that opened a cigar bar around the corner from dickshift #1 ends up splitting the finite amount of dongchompers that will buy overpriced cigars, effectively putting them both out of business.
I’m not saying I want to go sleep in the park with homeless people, or that I give to them with any regularity. Hell, I probably find it just as annoying as the next guy, but I also find it really disturbing when this is the official party line from the city:
City leaders say the newer version is just the beginning to keeping a destination place exactly that, despite the possibility the panhandlers could get pushed into the surrounding neighborhoods.
Yes, city leaders are more concerned about the tourist industry than the homeless, but that’s not all! They are also going on record saying you don’t matter, fuck you very much if the homeless end up on your front lawn, just as long as we keep the Vinoy full.
I’ll only give this one long, run on sentence because I’ll cover it more later: VOTE NO ON 1 - social programming is at stake because Charlie “holy fuck I paid a lot in taxes on my mansions” Crist and others have decided that you deserve an extra $200 a year instead of that money going to programs that not only help you, but more importantly those less fortunate than you. And if you get a chance, tell them that they can suck a fat dick if they think any of your money should go to moving a baseball stadium instead of supporting the poor, the disabled and a long list of better uses for our tax dollars.
got a tip?
love
buy shit
subscribe
recent comments
- Amy: ARTPool and BlueLucy present the third annual I Love St. Pete Show, January 10th,...
- Rob: have gun, will travel is playing the uptown bar. rebekah pulley is at the globe....
- Christy: The 2nd Annual “A Reason to Rock” Parkinson’s benefit...
- Autopsy IV: Tomorrow night Drag The River is playing the Tattoo Convention....
- Hellie: It is a damn fine looking restroom from the exterior. The interior is as scuzzy...
16 Responses
I agree that Rick Baker has taken a rather callous attitude towards the homeless in our area. You know, with cutting up the tents and stuff… However, I believe the city should be more concerned with tourism. Tourism is how St. Pete gets a large portion of its revenue so that they can do something about the homeless. When you write, “I’m not saying I want to go sleep in the park with homeless people, or that I give to them with any regularity. Hell, I probably find it just as annoying as the next guy.” Well who else finds it annoying? That’s right. Sorority girls on spring break from the University of Wisconsin who happen to stumble into the Emerald. Replace “in the park” with “in my bed” and “homeless people” with “Amber from Madison” and your argument falls apart faster than a slashed tent.
On the fucking money!
i mean the article not the shit about sorority chicks…and I even like a good cigar now and again but there are a lot of rich doucebag assholes hanging around smoking those overpriced stogies…word. The yuppie versus homeless battle is on a loop in every “hip” urban area in America. Noone ever seems to win they just keep moving around.
Lyndon, I’m confused with your replacement theory, swapping the words you suggested we get: “I’m not saying I want to go sleep in my bed with Amber from Madison.” But, like, I do want to go sleep in my bed with Amber from Madison. Was that your point? Like if I kill a homeless dude it will impress Amber and she’ll be all up in my shit? I guess I can get down with that.
I’m too lazy to edit the post itself, so instead consider this the new post:
“Fuck homeless people, I’m about to score with Amber from Madison.”
Casey
I am tired of seeing hands in pants man all the time.
You’re right, Casey. I guess the way I read it was, I’m not SAYING I’m going to blah blah, but you know, if I did it would be with Amber from Madison as opposed to the ninja guy.
i find the I-4 like dense cloud of smoke coupled with the impenetrable cloud of hipster smug that hovers in The Emerald to be far more offensive than a homeless dude having a beer any day.
Good post.
Casey, I know that it is extremely aggravating to read information stating that the city is against the homless. But what that story lacked is the information on all the hard work the city is investing in social programs for the homeless. Take Pinellas Hope, Homeless Connect and the “Give a Hand Up not a Hand Out” social campaign that is providing people information on homeless orgranizations to donate fund sto that are actively assisting the homeless eveyday in St. Petersburg. The city is working to help the homeless, but allowing panhandeling is not the way.
I believe they had a similar ordinance passed in Chicago not too long ago and it wound up getting tossed when the City was sued for violation of First Amendment rights. Asking for money is actually considered ‘free speech.’ So all you St Pete ambulance chaser take notice, ninja man has a CASE!
The city is working to help the homeless, but allowing panhandeling is not the way.
How exactly does banning it help?
personally, i prefer the It’s Always Sunny in Philly crew’s approach to this problem
or i can screw up the link…
vigilante justice for all
Dude, people take their cigars very seriously, as is evidenced by this oddly creepy humidor porn I found.
I love homeless people. I love to grind them up for flavoring my matzoh ball soup. Yum!
Rabi’s matzoh ball soup is people. It’s peeeeeooooppppllleee!!!!!!11!
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply